RECONCEPTUALIZING ARABIC LANGUAGE CURRICULUM QUALITY: A STANDARDS-BASED EVALUATION OF THE GRADE EIGHT CURRICULUM IN ARABIC SCHOOLS IN BRUNEI DARUSSALAM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19060180Keywords:
curriculum evaluation; Arabic language teaching; four language skills; language curriculum design; teaching Arabic to non-native speakersAbstract
This study evaluates the content of the Arabic language curriculum prescribed for Grade Eight students in Arabic schools in Brunei Darussalam in light of international standards for language education. It seeks to determine the extent to which the curriculum aligns with principles of communicative competence and contemporary curriculum design quality. The study employed a descriptive-analytical evaluative approach within a mixed-methods research design, integrating quantitative and qualitative data. Questionnaire responses were analyzed through weighted percentages and descriptive statistics, while findings were interpreted in the light of semi-structured interviews, document analysis, and classroom observations, following the principle of methodological triangulation to enhance credibility and interpretive depth (Cohen et al., 2018, pp. 287–314; Johnson & Onwuegbuzie, 2004, pp. 14–26). The study sample consisted of Arabic language teachers responsible for teaching Grade Eight in Arabic schools in Brunei Darussalam. The findings indicate that the curriculum demonstrates an acceptable to good level of pedagogical and linguistic adequacy. It is broadly appropriate to students’ linguistic and developmental levels and exhibits considerable strength in lexical and grammatical organization, particularly in supporting reading comprehension and sentence construction. However, the results also reveal a relative imbalance in the distribution of language skills, with reading and writing more strongly represented than listening and speaking, while the effective enactment of oral skills depends heavily on teacher initiative (Richards, 2013, pp. 5–33; Canale& Swain, 1980, pp. 1–47). The study further found that the curriculum privileges Islamic and Arab cultural content more than local Bruneian sociocultural realities, and that morphology and learner differentiation remain comparatively underdeveloped. Accordingly, the study recommends strengthening skill balance, redesigning morphological progression, and expanding the representation of local cultural context in accordance with contemporary principles of materials development (Tomlinson, 2012, pp. 143–179).
References
Al-Batal, M. (2017). Arabic as one language: Integrating dialect in the Arabic language curriculum. Georgetown University Press.
Alosh, M. (2016).Teaching Arabic as a foreign language: Issues and directions.Georgetown University Press.
Baker, W. (2012). From cultural awareness to intercultural awareness: Culture in ELT. ELT Journal, 66(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr017
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Open University Press.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1
Chapelle, C. A. (2010). The spread of computer-assisted language learning. Language Teaching, 43(1), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444809005850
Chapelle, C. A., & Douglas, D. (2006).Assessing language through computer technology.Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
Coombe, C., Vafadar, H., &Mohebbi, H. (2020). Language assessment literacy: What do we need to learn, unlearn, and relearn? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64, 100822.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100822
Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186
Deunk, M. I., Smale-Jacobse, A. E., de Boer, H., Doolaard, S., & Bosker, R. J. (2018). Effective differentiation practices: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the cognitive effects of differentiation practices in primary education. Educational Research Review, 24, 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.02.002
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching.Oxford University Press.
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage.
Graves, K. (2008). The language curriculum: A social contextual perspective. Language Teaching, 41(2), 147–181. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004867
Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005
Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635547
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching.Wiley-Blackwell.
McDonough, K., Crawford, W. J., & Mackey, A. (2015).Interaction and the development of oral communication skills. System, 50, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.01.001
Nation, I. S. P., & Macalister, J. (2010).Language curriculum design.Routledge.
Norris, J. M. (2016). Current uses for task-based language assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 230–244. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190516000027
Porto, M., Houghton, S. A., & Byram, M. (2018).Intercultural citizenship in the (foreign) language classroom.Language Teaching Research, 22(5), 484–498.https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817718580
Purpura, J. E. (2016).Second and foreign language assessment. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 190–208.https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12318
Richards, J. C. (2013). Curriculum approaches in language teaching: Forward, central, and backward design. RELC Journal, 44(1), 5–33.https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212473293
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Ryding, K. C. (2014). Teaching and learning Arabic as a foreign language: A guide for teachers. Georgetown University Press.
Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning.Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329–363.https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089921
Shawer, S. F. (2010). Classroom-level curriculum development: EFL teachers as curriculum-developers, curriculum-makers and curriculum-transmitters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 173–184.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.015
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 263–308.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x
Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 45(2), 143–179.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000528
Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K., Conover, L. A., & Reynolds, T. (2003).Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2–3), 119–145.https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320302700203
Wahba, K., Taha, Z., & England, L. (2013).Handbook for Arabic language teaching professionals.Routledge.
Weir, C. J. (2005). Language testing and validation: An evidence-based approach. Palgrave Macmillan.https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230514577
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Author(s) and co-author(s) jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties and that the Article has not been published elsewhere. Author(s) agree to the terms that the WSEAS Journal will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.
