A STANDARDS-BASED EVALUATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ARABIC LANGUAGE LEARNING ASSESSMENT SYSTEM FOR EIGHTH-GRADE STUDENTS IN ARABIC SCHOOLS IN BRUNEI DARUSSALAM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19060038Keywords:
Arabic language learning assessment; language assessment; communicative competence; four language skills; communicative assessment; teaching Arabic to non-native speakers; Arabic schools in Brunei Darussalam.Abstract
This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of the Arabic language learning assessment system for eighth-grade students in Arabic schools in Brunei Darussalam in light of global standards for language assessment, with particular emphasis on validity, comprehensiveness, alignment, and balance across the four language skills. The study adopted a mixed-methods approach using an explanatory sequential design. Quantitative data were collected from 201 students through a five-point Likert-scale questionnaire, and the findings were subsequently enriched by qualitative evidence derived from semi-structured interviews with 15 teachers, document analysis, and classroom observations. Quantitative data were analyzed using percentages and relative weights, whereas qualitative data were examined through thematic analysis. The findings revealed that the assessment system demonstrates a generally good level of overall effectiveness, albeit with noticeable variation across its components. Writing emerged as the most strongly assessed skill (80.2%), followed by reading (78.9%), speaking (76.2%), and listening (74.5%), indicating a relative preference for written over oral skills. The results further showed a good level of test validity (81.2%) and alignment with curricular content (77.7%), alongside the continued dominance of grammar-based questions (82.1%), a relative imbalance between theoretical and practical dimensions (67.8%), and a limited presence of diagnostic assessment (63%). The study underscores the need to develop the assessment system toward a more communicative and integrated model that strengthens performance-based and formative assessment and measures learners’ actual linguistic competence in a more comprehensive manner.
References
Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing reading.Cambridge University Press.
Alderson, J. C., Clapham, C., & Wall, D. (1995).Language test construction and evaluation.Cambridge University Press.
Al-Batal, M. (2017). Arabic as one language: Integrating dialect in the Arabic language curriculum. Georgetown University Press.
Alosh, M. (2016).Teaching Arabic as a foreign language: Issues and directions.Georgetown University Press.
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing.Oxford University Press.
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996).Language testing in practice.Oxford University Press.
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (2010). Language assessment in practice: Developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world. Oxford University Press.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Open University Press.
Black, P., &Wiliam, D. (2009).Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
Brindley, G. (2013).Assessment literacy in language education.Routledge.
Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading.ASCD.
Brown, H. D., &Abeywickrama, P. (2019). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices (3rd ed.). Pearson.
Canale, M. (1983).From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy.In J. Richards & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication.Longman.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1
Celce-Murcia, M., Dörnyei, Z., &Thurrell, S. (1995). Communicative competence: A pedagogically motivated model. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 5–35.
Chapelle, C. A. (2010). The spread of computer-assisted language learning. Language Teaching, 43(1), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444809005850
Chapelle, C. A., & Douglas, D. (2006).Assessing language through computer technology.Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
Coombe, C., Vafadar, H., &Mohebbi, H. (2020). Language assessment literacy: What do we need to learn, unlearn, and relearn? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64, 100822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100822
Council of Europe. (2020). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment—Companion volume. Council of Europe Publishing.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
Davies, A. (2008). Textbook trends in teaching language testing. Language Testing, 25(3), 327–347.https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532208090156
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics.Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching.Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2018). Reflections on task-based language teaching.Multilingual Matters.
Fulcher, G. (2012). Assessment literacy for the language classroom. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9(2), 113–132.https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.642041
Fulcher, G. (2015). Re-examining language testing: A philosophical and social inquiry.Routledge.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315733050
Fulcher, G., & Davidson, F. (2007). Language testing and assessment: An advanced resource book. Routledge.https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203937761
González-Lloret, M., & Ortega, L. (2014).Technology-mediated task-based language teaching. John Benjamins.
Green, A. (2014). Exploring language assessment and testing: Language in action. Routledge.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315889627
Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635547
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence.In J. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics.Penguin.
Inbar-Lourie, O. (2008). Constructing a language assessment knowledge base. Language Testing, 25(3), 385–402.https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532208090158
Levi, T., & Inbar-Lourie, O. (2020).Assessment literacy or language assessment literacy. Language Assessment Quarterly, 17(2), 168–182.https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2019.1692347
Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching.Wiley-Blackwell.
Luoma, S. (2004).Assessing speaking.Cambridge University Press.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733017
McNamara, T. (2000).Language testing.Oxford University Press.
McNamara, T., &Roever, C. (2006). Language testing: The social dimension. Blackwell.
Messick, S. (1989).Validity.In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). Macmillan.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., &Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.
Nation, I. S. P., & Macalister, J. (2010).Language curriculum design.Routledge.
Norris, J. M. (2016). Current uses for task-based language assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 230–244.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190516000027
North, B. (2014). The CEFR in practice. Language Teaching, 47(4), 459–465.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000201
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.
Purpura, J. E. (2016).Second and foreign language assessment. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 190–208.https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12318
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Ryding, K. C. (2014). Teaching and learning Arabic as a foreign language: A guide for teachers. Georgetown University Press.
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). Routledge.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003185536
Savignon, S. J. (2018). Communicative competence.Routledge.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315228280
Skehan, P. (2018). Second language task-based performance.Routledge.
Stiggins, R. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4), 324–328.https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170508700414
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). The SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2nd ed.). Sage.https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193
Taylor, L. (2013). Communicating the theory, practice and principles of language testing. Language Testing, 30(3), 403–412.https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532213480338
Wahba, K., Taha, Z., & England, L. (2013).Handbook for Arabic language teaching professionals.Routledge.
Weir, C. J. (2005). Language testing and validation: An evidence-based approach. Palgrave Macmillan.https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230514577
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Author(s) and co-author(s) jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties and that the Article has not been published elsewhere. Author(s) agree to the terms that the WSEAS Journal will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.
