Risk Analysis in Vegetable Farms - Aggressivity Evaluation

Authors

  • ERISA MUSABELLI Management Department Author
  • OLTA NEXHIPI Management Department Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/5w8nn943

Keywords:

risk, production, matrix, perception, analysis, evaluation, aggressivity, Albania

Abstract

Vegetable production can be considered one of the most vital activities of agriculture. This study focuses on open-field vegetable production farms in Albania. The study's objective is to identify risks according to five main categories: the production process, finding sources of financing, marketing products, compliance with laws, and human resources management. This study aims to use qualitative analysis of the risks that
threaten vegetable farms. The risk factor for each event is measured as a combination of probability and impact.For this study,isused the risk matrix method. Based on the matrix analysis, we concluded that the highest risk factors are flood, diseases, and pests, sometimes also illness or death of farmers. In general risk factors are unlikely to occur, but if the event occurs, the damage is catastrophic (they have the aggressiveness of a shark).Meanwhile, out of 19 risk factors analyzed, 52% have the aggressiveness of the rabbit, which means great fear,but the damage is relatively small, and 26% have the aggressiveness of the mouse, which means they have little likelihood and have no impact on the farmer's objectives.

Author Biographies

  • ERISA MUSABELLI, Management Department

    Management Department,
    Faculty of Business,
    “Aleksandër Moisiu” University Durrës,ALBANIA

  • OLTA NEXHIPI, Management Department

    Management Department,
    Faculty of Business,
    “Aleksandër Moisiu” University Durrës,ALBANIA

References

Kurtaj, D., Çerpja, T., Arif Murrja, A. (2024).

Financial Risk Analysis-Case study Guri I Zi in the Municipality of Shkodër in Albania.

WSEAS Transactions on Environment and

R., Kapaj, I. (2024). Examination of the Importance and Level of Application of Digitisation in the Rural Sector, the Case of Albania,WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics,vol. 21, pp. 528-543,https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2024.21.44.

[4]Lowenberg-DeBoer, J. (2022).Economics of

adoption for digital automated technologies in agriculture.Background paperfor The State of Food and Agriculture 2022.FAO Agricultural Development Economics Working Paper 22-10. Rome, FAO.https://doi.org/10.4060/cc2624en.

[5]Domi, S., Keco, R., Musabelliu B., Kapaj, I.

(2018). A review of factors affecting SMEs'performance: An Albanian rural tourism perspective. Albanian J. Agric. sci. 2018;(Special edition –Proceedings of ICOALS,2018).Agricultural University of Tirana,Tirana, Albania, [Online].https://ajas.site/wp-

content/uploads/2018/11/06_AJAS_Full-Paper_Shpresim-Domi_ICOALS-2018.pdf

(Accessed Date: October 10, 2024).

[6]Degila, J., Sodedji, F.A.K.; Avakoudjo,

H.G.G., Tahi, S.P.G., Houetohossou, S.C.A.,Honfoga, A.-C., Tognisse, I.S.; Assogbadjo,A.E. Digital Agriculture Policies and Strategies for Innovations in the Agri-Food Systems—Cases of Five West African Countries.Sustainability2023, 15, 9192.

https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129192.

[7]Osmani. M., Keco, R., Kambo, A., and

Tomorri, I. (2020). Factors Influencing Consumers’ Perceptions of Safety Risk of Fresh Domestic Tomato in Albania Multinomial Econometric Approach.Int. J.Food System Dynamics,11 (4), 2020, 387-401 http://dx.doi.org/10.18461/ijfsd.v11i4.62.

[8]Keco, R. & Gjika, I. (2021). Value chain

coordination and standards: the case of greenhouse vegetables in Albania.Bulg. J.Agric. Sci.,27 (3), 469–478.https://www.agrojournal.org/27/03-04.pdf.

[9]Fletcher, W. R. J. (2015). Review and

refinement of an existing qualitative risk

assessment method for application within an ecosystem-based management framework.ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72(3), 1043-1056.https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsu142.

[10]Ndregjoni, A., Murrja, A., Prendi, L. (2023).

Analysis of Legal Risk in Farms of Intensive Chicken Production - The Case of Kosovo.

WSEAS Transactions on Environment and

Development, vol. 19, pp. 655-667.

https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2023.19.64.

[11]Murrja, A., Ndreca, P., Maloku, S., Meço, M.

(2023). Analysis of Production Risk in Intensive Chicken Farms – the Case of Kosovo.Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, 23(2),300–316.https://doi.org/10.2478/foli-2023-

0032.

[12]Murrja, A., Ndregjoni, N., Maloku, S., &

Prendi, Ll. (2022). Aggressiveness of market risk events and their management in intensive chicken breeding farms in Kosovo.Specialusis Ugdymas, 2(43):386-402.

[13]Murrja, A. (2023).Risk analysis of human

resources in the farms of intensive rearing of chickens in Kosovo.Conference: IBANESS

Congress Series on Economics, Business and

Management,At: Plovdiv, Bulgaria.Volume:Proceedings of XIX. Page38-49. ISBN: 978-619-203-339-2.

[14]Murrja, A., Vuniqi, D., Maloku, S. (2023).

Risk Management in the Intensive Poultry Industry in Kosovo.Conference: 2nd International Scientific Conference “BRIDGE 2023”, “The Future of Science: Challenges and Opportunities" At Prizren, Kosovo.

[15]Martinovska Stojcheska, A., Agic, R. and

Janeska Stamenkovska, I. (2021). Vegetable production in North Macedonia -competitiveness, trends and challenges.Acta Hortic.1320,79-86

https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.132 0.10.

[16]Ivanov, R., & Atanasov, D.(2023). Risk

management in agriculture.Agricultural

Sciences,15(37), Article 005.

https://doi.org/10.22620/agrisci.2023.37.005.

[17]Komarek, A. M., De Pinto, A., Smith, V. H.

(2020). A review of types of risks in agriculture: What we know and what we need to know.Agricultural Systems, 178, 102738.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102738.

[18]Aven, T. (2016). Risk assessment and risk

management: Review of recent advances on their foundation.European Journal of Operational Research, 253(1), 1-13.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023.

Published

2025-11-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Risk Analysis in Vegetable Farms - Aggressivity Evaluation. (2025). WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 22(1), 44-56. https://doi.org/10.5281/5w8nn943